Justice4Poland.com

Connecting true geography and detailed unfolding of wide variety of crimes perpetrated by German/Ukrainian Nazis and jewish bolsheviks of Soviet Union on the Polish nation.

Hunt for the Jews: Betrayal and Murder in German-Occupied Poland


Book author: Jan Grabowski

=====================

=====================================

The JUDENJAGD in Action?

Not Reliable and Not Objective.

Review by  Jan Peczkis 

The reader learns of some Poles denouncing Jews for the German reward of a bag of sugar, of grabbing anything that belonged to Jews, of even respectable Poles denouncing Jews, and of members of the Polish Blue Police (POLICJA GRANATOWA) drinking to assuage their acts against Jews, etc. Did you know that Jews acted in astonishingly the same ways (towards other Jews, and that even before the actual Holocaust)? Please click on In Those Terrible Days: Writings from the Lodz Ghetto and read the detailed Peczkis review. Clearly, this overall repulsive conduct was severe wartime demoralization, and not some mythical Poles’ “failure of the test of humanity” (p. 5).

Every nationality and every war has produced its share of collaborators (surprise–also Poles)–a fact acknowledged even by nationalistic Polish works. Thus, the constantly repeated mantra that Poles need to be disabused of the “heroic narrative” of their history is misplaced. More on this later.

This book is another “sequel” to Jan T. Gross ( the Poles-hater – Admin. )

ScreenHunter_123 Jul. 28 14.56 ScreenHunter_911 Oct. 16 19.07

Most readers, affected by media spin, suppose that the investigative IPN Commission has proved Gross right on Jedwabne. For clarification, please click on the IPN proceedings, Wokól Jedwabnego, and read the detailed English-language Peczkis review.

My review is divided into the following topics:

GRABOWSKI’S UNRELIABLE SOURCES OF INFORMATION
DABROWA TARNOWSKA COUNTY: THE “HEROIC NARRATIVE” STANDS
SURVIVORSHIP OF FUGITIVE JEWS THROUGHOUT POLAND
WHO DENOUNCED DABROWA’S FUGITIVE JEWS?
FACTORS IN POLISH ACTS AGAINST FUGITIVE JEWS
“EXPLOITIVE” AND “MURDEROUS” POLISH BENEFACTORS OF JEWS?
AUTHOR JAN GRABOWSKI’S IDEOLOGICAL UNDERPINNING

GRABOWSKI’S UNRELIABLE SOURCES OF INFORMATION

Grabowski relies largely on postwar trials of alleged Polish collaborators. He asserts that the new Communist authorities did not tamper with these trials. (p. 12, 279-on). To the contrary: It is a well-known fact that the U. B. (Communist police) habitually beat suspects into giving the desired confessions and testimonies, and framed innocent people. However, even if Grabowski was technically correct, his contention would still fly in the face of reality. The early years of the Soviet-imposed puppet government were a reign of terror designed to intimidate the Polish nation into abject submission. There were tens of thousands of murders and eventually hundreds of thousands of arbitrary arrests. [One of my uncles permanently “disappeared” one day, even though he had never been involved in anything remotely political.] How could credible trials even be imagined in this toxic atmosphere?

Revealingly, Grabowski points out that the allegations of collaboration were based on accusations made by disgruntled neighbors, jilted lovers, and feuding relatives. How credible are they? One quoted testimony was made by a German who (allegedly) was told by a surrendered Jew that a Polish peasant had (allegedly) informed the German about a certain Pole (allegedly) engaging in collaboration. Hearsay!

The author complains that some defendants successfully shifting the blame to “conveniently” dead individuals, and that the A. K. (ARMIA KRAJOWA) reckoned that a Jew they had targeted had spied for the Germans. (pp. 275-276). [Such Jews definitely existed, and one of the A. K.’s highest priorities was self-protection through counter-intelligence.] Instead of only showing the weak, unverifiable, and my-word-versus-your-word character of the counter-allegations and alibis, does it not also say the VERY SAME about the original accusations themselves? Does it not point to the impossibility of determining what actually happened–including the justification or otherwise of the alleged Jew-killing?

Jewish gestapo chief-Heinrich MullerJew !

This book also rests in part on decades-later trials of German defendants in Germany. Admittedly, the German defendants tended effectively to shift the blame to the Poles. (p. 14). In addition, the reader needs to know that the Jewish witnesses had, over time, tended to revert to the historic Germanophilic orientation of most Polish Jews. This likely made them less anti-German and, to relieve the dissonance, more anti-Polish. [This tendency also animates much current Jewish Holocaust-related thinking.] In addition, Holocaust survivors tended to graft into their memories incidents that they had heard from others but not experienced themselves. [See the Peczkis review of COLLECTED MEMORIES, by Christopher R. Browning.]

DABROWA TARNOWSKA COUNTY: THE “HEROIC NARRATIVE” STANDS

Grabowski concludes that, in this county, 51 fugitive Jews survived the war (p. 15), while another 200 were definitely killed through denunciation, and 14 were killed directly by locals (Table 5:2). This is out of 5,500-6,000 Jews in Dabrowa County, the vast majority of which were ghettoized, and then murdered at Belzec, by the Germans.

The 200 denounced begs the question about the ethnicities of the denouncers. Just because a local spoke Polish, and even had a Polish-sounding name, hardly means that he was necessarily an ethnic Pole. He could have also been a German (VOLKSDEUTSCHE). (In fact, even the matter of signing the VOLKSLISTE admittedly went as far as dividing families: p. 265). The POLICJA GRANATOWA had its share of embedded Polish-speaking German agents, ensuring Polish conformity to German directives, and enabling Germans to commit crimes against Jews as “Poles”.

In addition, many Polish-speaking Ukrainians served the Germans, throughout German-occupied Poland, and not only in native Ukrainian regions. As for Jewish denouncers of Jews in hiding, Grabowski mentions the ghettos, but glosses over their function in rural areas.

The serious reader should examine all this thoroughly. Study the detailed, objective, free online book: PATTERNS OF COOPERATION, COLLABORATION AND BETRAYAL: JEWS, GERMANS AND POLES IN OCCUPIED POLAND DURING WORLD WAR II, by Mark Paul.

http://www.internationalresearchcenter.org/en/holocaust-forgotten-or-revisited1/patterns-of-cooperation-collaboration-and-betrayal-jews-germans-and-poles-in-occupied-poland-during-world-war-ii

Click to access PatternsOfCooperationCollaborationAndBetrayal.pdf

The numbers presented by Grabowski, if accurate, are themselves telling. Since some denouncers were not ethnic Poles, and the average denouncer probably caused the death of more than one Jew, it follows that fewer than 200 Poles were responsible for the demise of the 200 proved (or half-proved) denounced Jews. This is a vanishing fraction of the nearly 60,000 rural Poles of Dabrowa County!

As for the incompleteness of the 200 figure, the implications do not change, as it cannot–at most–be many multiples greater. Of the 5,500-6,000 Jews living in this county, only a small fraction (up to perhaps 10%, that is, 550-600 or fewer) of them ever fled the ghettos and thereby became fugitive Jews.

In any case, the facts are clear. Grabowski has not presented ANY evidence that overturns the long-held so-called “heroic narrative”–namely that only a tiny fraction of 1% of the Polish population collaborated with the Nazis, in this case against Jews.

SURVIVORSHIP OF FUGITIVE JEWS THROUGHOUT POLAND

This work, if valid, is not necessarily representative of the rest of rural Poland. Grabowski scrupulously ignores every single one of the works of historian Marek Jan Chodakiewicz. In his BETWEEN NAZIS AND SOVIETS, Chodakiewicz shows that a relatively high 300 of 1,000 fugitive Jews, in another rural area of Poland, survived the German occupation (30%).

When it comes to all-Poland fugitive-Jew survival rates, Grabowski is tendentious. He rejects Jewish scholar Szymon Datner’s estimate of 100,000 fugitive Jews surviving and another 100,000 fugitive Jews perishing (with and WITHOUT the acts of Poles). Instead, he arbitrarily prefers a newer figure of no more than 50,000 survivors–with as many as 200,000 fugitive Jewish perishing. (pp. 2-3). [Jan T. Gross once quoted the latter figure as fact.] In actuality, considering ALL scholarly estimates, the percentage of fugitive Jews in German-occupied Poland that survived the war could plausibly range from a low of 12% to a high of 71%. See POLISH-JEWISH RELATIONS 1939-1945, by Ewa Kurek.

FACTORS IN POLISH ACTS AGAINST FUGITIVE JEWS

Jan Grabowski oversimplifies Poles as having life-and-death powers over fugitive Jews under Nazi rule. (p. 5). Poles throughout German-occupied Poland were part of a corvee system, in which the Germans forced Poles into various forms of compulsory labor, only one of which potentially involved the hunt for fugitive Jews (JUDENJAGD). In addition, Poles acted under duress (as when Germans led the JUDENJAGDs), even when this was not obvious (when the Germans did not lead them directly). The reader should remember that the German-Polish relationship was not that between colleagues or partners. Far from it. It was one between conqueror and conquered, UBERMENSCHEN and UNTERMENSCHEN, master and servant, terrorizer and terrorized. Grabowski (p. 24) realizes that Poles were just one rung above the Jews, in German thinking, but evidently does not internalize this fact.

Grabowski dismisses the 1939-1941 Jewish-Soviet collaboration as locally irrelevant. Is the reader seriously supposed to believe that Polish anger over Jewish-Soviet collaboration existed ONLY in the geographic areas in which it occurred?

The author briefly alludes to Jewish banditry, but fails to develop this pivotal subject. Banditry is commonly a capital crime during war. Considering additionally that Poles were living in near-starvation conditions under the German occupation, is it surprising that they reacted fiercely to news of Jewish banditry, and sometimes were receptive to German propaganda that characterized ALL ghetto-fleeing Jews as bandits? Polish participants in the JUDENJAGD likely thought themselves protectors of Poles from banditry rather than as hunters of Jews. What’s more, the privations faced by Poles made even modest German rewards for denouncing Jews especially tempting.

Grabowski understates the German-imposed death penalty for the slightest Polish aid to Jews, and glosses over its full implications. Heroism, by its very nature, must be exceptional, and some peasants instead opted to denounce Jewish trespassers at once rather than risk a German “visit”. [Frightened Poles sometimes first warned Jews of impending denunciation if the Jews did not leave the area. See the Peczkis review of ON BOTH SIDES OF THE WALL, by Vladka Meed.]

The accounts of Poles torturing and killing Jews are rather lurid. To the informed reader, they smack of old-fashioned GRUELPROPAGANDA, of the archetypical brutish GOY, and of the peasant-as-ogre Polonophobic tall tales of Jerzy Kosinski-Lewinkopf. Of course, some cruelties were real. Accustomed to the wanton savagery of the Germans [and of bandits], peasants sometimes imitated their cruelty (as, in parallel, did some Jewish kapos and Jewish ghetto policemen.)

Interestingly, the Germans prosecuted SZMALCOWNIKI for such offenses as bribing Germans and impersonating Gestapo personnel. (p. 262). This implicitly identifies them as all-around lowlifes, and not just extortionists of Jews. In addition, Grabowski realizes that Polish denouncers of Jews commonly later joined the dreaded Soviet-sponsored Communist security forces (U. B., or BEZPIEKA). (p. 267). This shows that such individuals (yes, including previously respectable citizens) were marginal members of Polish society in that they had no loyalty to Poles or Poland, nor sense of propriety. It also indicates that, rather than avid Jewish-property-getters or anti-Semites, they were equal-opportunity exploiters and killers of Poles as well as Jews. This even has a term: CHAMOKOMUNA (Boor Communism).

“EXPLOITIVE” AND “MURDEROUS” POLISH BENEFACTORS OF JEWS?

The author repeats Jan T. Gross’ myth of “greedy” Poles requiring payment to hide and continue hiding fugitive Jews. In actuality, Poles, owing to the near-starvation conditions under the German occupation, usually were in no position to feed Jews gratis.

Grabowski also emphasizes horror stories of Polish benefactors turning on their Jews and killing them. The unsuspecting English-speaking reader is unaware of the fragile death-defying co-dependency. The Polish benefactor knew that, were the Jew to leave, he would likely fall into German hands and then try anything to save his life, including denunciation of his Polish benefactor, with fatal consequences to the Pole and his family, and even the entire village. Furthermore, the Germans encouraged denunciations, by captured Jews, of Polish benefactors (as well as fellow Jews), through false promises of spared lives in exchange for information. Clearly, the Polish benefactor, having run out of resources, of superhuman courage, or both, was in an unenviable kill-or-be-killed situation, and sometimes acted accordingly.

AUTHOR JAN GRABOWSKI’S IDEOLOGICAL UNDERPINNING

Note that Grabowski’s bibliography features the usual small circle of left wing and Judeocentric authors (including Gross-clones and Gross-lites) to whom the author conforms. These include Omer Bartov, Ana Bikont, Barbara Engelking, Krystyna Kersten, and, of course, Jan T. Gross.

In addition, Jan Grabowski displays his bias through some whoppers. He euphemistically soft-pedals the murderous Soviet-serving Communist GL-AL as merely “left leaning”. (p. 272). Incredibly, he also suggests that the postwar Communist authorities were lenient against ideological enemies, including members of the A. K. (p. 12). On what planet is Grabowski walking on?

Interestingly, Grabowski largely relies on a work edited by Feliks Tych for the “factual” low estimates of the survival rates of Poland’s fugitive Jews. (p. 248). Tych is the son-in-law of super-Communist Jakub Berman, who Stalin handpicked to be one of the most powerful henchmen in Poland’s original Communist puppet government. Is Tych credible?

A number of historians have identified Jan Grabowski as a neo-Stalinist. This is not in the sense of rehabilitating Joseph Stalin, but in the sense of resurrecting Stalinist-era motifs that demonize non-leftist Poles as incurable anti-Semites, fascists, and Nazis. Read the detailed Peczkis review of GOLDEN HARVEST OR HEARTS OF GOLD?

Finally, the reader should be aware of the fact that there has been, in recent years in Poland, a flurry of activities surrounding property restitution. Is the Holocaust Industry, with its efforts to extort massive “reparations” money from Poland, directly or indirectly behind this book?

Jan Peczkis 

=============================

http://www.amazon.com/review/R3TMIDGRA9J8KR

===============

===============================

ScreenHunter_913 Oct. 16 19.34

YOU WON’T SILENCE ME – ONLY TRUTH CAN SET US FREE !!

8 comments on “Hunt for the Jews: Betrayal and Murder in German-Occupied Poland

  1. Jan Peczkis
    June 12, 2017

    Barbara Engelking, a clone of Jan Grabowski and Jan T. Gross, has just published a new English version of her anti-Polish book, and I have just deconstructed it:

    https://www.amazon.com/gp/review/R3A8BRQDI3ZSZD?ref_=glimp_1rv_cl

  2. Jan Peczkis
    June 22, 2017

    BILINGUAL INTONATION FOR STREET DEMONSTRATIONS

    By Jan Peczkis

    (Drumbeat Series)

    Many genocides—Don’t you know?
    Holocaust Supremacy has got to go!
    Enough anti-Polish rhyme
    Equal time for Jewish crime!

    (Drumbeat Series)

    Holocaust Industry—having fun?
    Get the money from the Hun!
    No ex post facto laws
    Off Poland keep your paws!
    German crimes and Poles pay?
    No! No Way!

    (Drumbeat Series)

    Szkopa zbrodnia—Szkopa pieniadz!
    Szkopa zbrodnia—Szkopa pieniadz!
    Szkopa zbrodnia—Szkopa pieniadz!
    Szkopa zbrodnia—Szkopa pieniadz!

    (Drumbeat Series)

    Polska Sila—Polish power!
    Polska Sila—Polish power!
    Polska Sila—Polish power!
    Polska Sila—Polish power!

    (Drumbeat Series)

    [REPEAT ENTIRE SEQUENCE]

    • HKW
      June 22, 2017

      Great! What a pity WordPress has banned me from posting. This is the only menu that works on my blog. The rest has been frozen. I will post the poem on facebook. Thanks.

  3. Jan Peczkis
    June 24, 2017

    Thanks.

    ACADEMIC FREEDOM IS IN DANGER–YES, BUT FROM WHOM?

    Polonophobe Jan Grabowski (June 2017) would have us believe that the (widespread and well-deserved) criticisms of his claims are an “attack on academic freedom”. Oh, really?

    Consider Professors Norman Davies and Norman Finkelstein–two examples of REAL Holocaust-related attacks on academic freedom:

    THE CHILLING EFFECT, OWING TO PROFESSORS BEING DENIED TENURE FOR IDEOLOGICAL NONCONFORMISM, IS OBVIOUS: ANY PROFESSOR BETTER NOT SEEM TOO CONGENIAL TO POLAND!

    ——————————————-

    Smith, Burke. 1988. Davies Case Exposes Tenure Process to Public Scrutiny. THE STANFORD DAILY 199(25), p. 2. (March 9, 1988).

    Direct Quotes:

    “Although Stanford recently won the legal battle waged by former Visiting Prof. Norman Davies against the University, many leading historians agree that the History Department mistakenly denied tenure to a scholar considered the world’s leading historian on Poland.”

    “According to Davies, the political controversy stemmed from claims by Jewish members of the department that his work was insensitive to the plight of the Polish Jewry during World War II.”

    “…Zbigniew Brzezinski…Other Davies supporters include noted MIT political scientist and linguist Noam Chomsky; Aloysius Mazewski, president of the Polish National Alliance of the United States; Antony Polonsky, prominent Jewish historian of Poland; and Israel Shahak, chair of the Israeli League for Human and Civil Rights.”

    “Critics of ‘God’s Playground,’ however, call it ‘uncritical,’ ‘advocatory’ or ‘non-explanatory’–all terms which imply that the work is unscholarly.” [CODE WORDS FOR WORKS THAT DEVIATE FROM THE STANDARD NARRATIVE.]

    “Although Davies’ reputation appears to contradict the History Department’s decision, it is difficult to uncover reasons for his rejection.” [BECAUSE THEY ARE BOGUS.]

    “…observers agree that it was the closest, most acrimonious tenure decision of recent years. Sheehan characterizes the decision as an honest appraisal of Davies’ total scholarship, but Davies’ court complaint quotes History Prof. Lewis Spitz as calling the ‘Jewish issue’ the reason for the decision.”

    “Though University Provost James Rosse claimed that the faculty did not focus solely on the controversial chapter, Slavic Studies Prof. Richard Schupbach confirmed in memo that all criticisms at the meeting were in fact ‘directed specifically at [Davies’ treatment of Polish- Jewish relations].’”

    —————————————————————————————

    [Abraham, Matthew. 2011. THE QUESTION OF PALESTINE AND THE SUBVERSION OF ACADEMIC FREEDOM: DEPAUL’S DENIAL OF TENURE TO NORMAN G. FINKELSTEIN. Arab Studies Quarterly 33(3/4)179-203.]

    “Upon the publication of THE HOLOCAUST INDUSTRY, Finkelstein promptly lost his long-term instructor position of political science at Hunter College, City University of New York. Despite possessing an outstanding teaching record and three internationally recognized books to his credit at that time, he was let go under the pretext of a budgetary cut within the political science department.” (pp. 193-194).

    “Despite the sound and the fury around his tenure denial, Finkelstein ultimately praised DePaul University upon reflecting on the unique set of pressures that eventuated in his unjust dismissal: ‘For the record, I did not begrudge DePaul’s decision to deny me tenure. It has always been my belief that no one except me should have to bear the costs of my political convictions. The sustained pressures exerted on a middle-tier Catholic institution vulnerable to charges of anti-Semitism would probably have proven intolerable.’” (p. 180).

    “Since Finkelstein’s compelling indictments of American Zionism in books such as THE IMAGE AND REALITY OF THE ISRAEL-PALESTINE CONFLICT, THE HOLOCAUST INDUSTRY: THE EXPLOITATION OF JEWISH SUFFERING, AND BEYOND CHUTZPAH: THE MISUSE OF ANTI-SEMITISM AND THE ABUSE OF HISTORY could not be rebutted by serious counterarguments, his ideological nemeses resorted to attacking Finkelstein’s tone, writing style, and personality, effectively shifting the terms of the debate from the Israel-Palestine conflict to issues of civility and behavior.” (p. 191).

  4. Jan Peczkis
    June 24, 2017

    VOODOO NUMBERS (A FANTASTIC 160,000—-250,000 FUGITIVE POLISH JEWS IN HIDING)

    —Repeated by Jan T. Gross, Barbara Engelking, Jan Grabowski, and the Media:

    How imagined?

    Of 3.4 million Polish Jews at the start of WWII (1939):

    —2.5 MILLION JEWS STILL ALIVE AT THE START OF THE GERMAN-MADE HOLOCAUST (Spring 1942)

    —OF THESE, 6.4%—10.0%, THAT IS, 160,000—250,000 JEWS, assumed to have FLED THE GHETTOS AND WENT INTO HIDING

    —OF WHOM 40,000 [THAT IS, ONLY 16%-25%] SURVIVED THE NAZI GERMAN OCCUPATION

    Surprise: Poles are then blamed for causing the deaths of those Jews that did not survive. In reality, a considerable number of fugitive Jews were found directly by German patrols, or were denounced by VOLKDSDEUTSCHE or other non-Poles.

    FACT: The 250,000 rests on the musings [not published research] of the late Szymon Datner, whom Grabowski assures us had studied this matter. But this hardly makes Datner correct!

    FACT: Jan Grabowski, despite being repeatedly challenged to do so, has NEVER PUBLISHED ANYTHING, such as detailed wartime or postwar censuses or statistics, which substantiate these figures. What does this tell us?

    FACT: Also based partly on assertions of Emmanuel Ringelblum, a Jew in hiding. It is easily shown that Ringelblum’s figures are nothing more than ARM-WAVING. Click on [and read my detailed review] of

    [[ASIN:0810109638 Polish-Jewish Relations During the Second World War]]

    SO DRAW YOUR OWN CONCLUSIONS ON THE CREDIBILITY OF THE 160,000-250,000, 16%-25% VOODOO NUMBERS

    —————–

    In fact, Grabowski’s claims are so egregious that over 130 Polish academics have signed a statement challenging him.

    http://www.anti-defamation.org/rdiplad/?ddownload=1668

    Jan Grabowski’s response? AD HOMINEM. If you cannot refute the message, then attack the messenger. Evidently, Grabowski’s arguments are so weak that he did the only thing he could do—try to impugn the qualifications of his critics. He pointed out that the signees are not Holocaust scholars—as if only Holocaust scholars are intelligent enough to properly understand and disagree with him!

    ———-

    But no matter. Let us play Grabowski’s game, wherein only Holocaust scholars can validly criticize other Holocaust scholars.

    Holocaust scholar Teresa Prekerowa, who had studied fugitive Jews and their rescue for many years, and is eminently qualified to discuss this subject, had arrived at 80,000—120,000 Jews in hiding, of whom 50 PERCENT SURVIVED. See my review of:

    [[ASIN:0415755395 My Brother’s Keeper: Recent Polish Debates on the Holocaust]]

    Prekerowa’s 50% estimate has been supported by a recent study:

    [[ASIN:9653084496 Jewish Presence in Absence: The Aftermath of the Holocaust in Poland, 1944 2010]]

    So:

    Given 40,000 surviving Polish Jews:

    Was it 80,000—120,000 Jews in hiding, or was it 160,000—250,000?

    Was it a 50% fugitive-Jew survival rate, or was it only 16%—25%?

    Clearly, at least one of the Holocaust scholars (Grabowski or Prekerowa) must be VERY WRONG. Evidently, Holocaust scholars are NOT infallible.

    Then again, when it comes to Jewish-victimization anti-Polish propaganda, who cares about the facts? THE WORSE THE CHOSEN VOODOO NUMBER MAKES POLES LOOK, THE BETTER.

    —————————

    Estimates of Percentages of Jews Who Fled the Ghettos Themselves are HIGHLY CONTRADICTORY

    Again, assuming 2.5 million Jews still alive at the start of the Holocaust:

    Grabowski: 6.4%—10.0% of them went into hiding

    Prekerowa: 3.2%–4.8% of them went into hiding

    Which was it?

    As per the best-studied ghetto, the Warsaw Ghetto, Holocaust scholars greatly contradict themselves. Gunnar Paulsson, based on 490,000 Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto, and a survey with statistics, arrived at 5.5% [3.9%—7.6% at 95% confidence limits]. Other Holocaust scholars had earlier cited a range of figures that span the entire range of 1% and 10.2%!

    For details, click on, and read my review, of:

    [[ASIN:B01F7XE6UE Secret City: The Hidden Jews of Warsaw, 1940-1945 by Gunnar S. Paulsson (2003-03-01)]]

    WE CANNOT GET SELF-CONSISTENT ESTIMATES, BY HOLOCAUST SCHOLARS, FOR EVEN one GHETTO, LET ALONE FOR THE SUM OF ALL THE GHETTOS IN GERMAN-OCCUPIED POLAND!

    And we are supposed to take Jan Grabowski, and his 160,000—250,000 fugitive-Jew voodoo numbers seriously—and moreover without question?

    Get real.

  5. Jan Peczkis
    November 25, 2017

    Nowe Badania: Polacy Czasami Zabijali Zydow Ze Wzgledu Specyficznego Terroru Niemieckiego Przeciwko Polskich Wiosek, i nic nie mialo wspolnego z antysemityzmem:

    Two parts of a new study, by a Holocaust-specializing scholar, shows the REAL reason that Poles sometimes killed Jews during the German occupation. It followed specific acts of German terror against Polish villages, and had nothing to do with anti-Semitism:

    https://www.amazon.com/gp/review/R3IQLLKJBMQRAT?ref_=glimp_1rv_cl

    https://www.amazon.com/gp/review/R20PV4EZOPNPWW?ref_=glimp_1rv_cl

    Jan Peczkis

  6. klka
    February 11, 2018

    do pana
    Co twierdzil ze w okolicach Parczewa polacy mordowali zydow,co sie okazalo to zydzi mordowali zydow….a jak widac dzisiaj ,wine zrzucaja na polakow,bardzzo to chwalebne,a zarazem symptomatyczne dla tej grupy ludzi.
    Ciekawym jest to, ze obie zwalczajace sie nawzajem grupy byly lewicewe ( z zalozenia chyba),co pozwala nam przypuszczac ze czlonkowie byli bardzo rozni,a nawet mogliby byc przedwojennym kryminalistami ktorzy przy okazji regulowali interesy roznej masci.
    To moje takie przypiszczenie wynikajace z tego ze ten element jest dosc sprytny i mniej uchwytny ,czyli posiada predyspozycje do przezycia znacznie wieksze jak reszta spoleczenstwa.

    Grupa walczyła ze Strażą Ludową ( Polska : Gwardia Ludowa ) w szeregu intensywnych starć z siłami niemieckimi, wykorzystując karabiny maszynowe, materiały wybuchowe do kolejek górniczych i inne zapasy wyrzucane przez wojska radzieckie, z żywnością zarekwirowaną z miejscowych rolnicy. Uczestniczyli w przejęciu miasta Parczew 16 kwietnia 1944 r. [1]

    Holocaust Encyclopedia twierdzi, że polska Armia Krajowa (AK) zwykle odmówiłprzyjęcia Żydów. Ta informacja jest jednak podważana na gruncie statystycznym przez żydowskiego weterana Pierwszej Dywizji Pancernej AK, Williego Glasera, który pisał, że żydowscy bojownicy ruchu oporu byli również licznymi członkami Armii Krajowej. [4]

     Również partyzanci Gwardii Ludowej(GL), stworzeni przez komunistyczny PPR w styczniu 1942 r. (Z którym wyrównali się partyzanci Parczewu), byli zaangażowani w terror, którego celem była lokalna dominacja. Pewnego razu oddział Gwardii Ludowej pod dowództwem Grzegorza Korczyńskiego z powiatu kraśnickiegopod Lublinem, w dniu 6 grudnia 1942 r. dokonano masowych okrucieństw we wsi Ludmiłówka, zabijając dziesiątki Żydów w odwecie za akcję PPR w Grabówce przeciwko własnym ludziom.
     Morderstwa zostały zamilknięte w stalinowskiej Polsce przez Ministerstwo Bezpieczeństwa Publicznego, które brutalnie prześladowało żołnierzy AK

    Niektóre ukraińskie źródła odnoszą się do tej operacji jako masakra ukraińskich mieszkańców wsi w okolicach Chełma i na Podlasiu, i przypisują tysiące zabitych do polskiego podziemia. [14][15] Takie roszczenia zostały odrzucone przez Instytut Pamięci Narodowej , [16] i zdemaskowana przez ukraińskich autorów Słownika Historycznego Ukrainy , którzy zwracają uwagę, że ostatnie badania potwierdzają znacznie mniejszą liczbę. [17] 
    Według żydowskich źródeł, żydowscy partyzanci sami wykorzystywali ukraińskich wieśniaków, “którzy poszli do lasu, aby dopaść Żydów, którzy uciekli” z gett. [18]
    Zabójstwa w wioskach w pobliżu lasu Parczew były motywowane zemstą za “antyżydowską działalność” ukraińskich chłopów.

    ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parczew_partisans

    tam ”wykorzystywali” nalezy zastapic slowem ”wykanczali”,ale i tak google chrome tlumaczy na tyle dobrze ze tekst da sie zrozumiec bez wiekszego wysilku.

    ….a za ukraincow medal im sie nalezy,a nawet pomnik,ich dzialanie potwierdzaja tylko co historia i ludzie daje swiadectwa ich okrucienstw.
    Wiele np zydowskich zrodel podaje,ze pogromy kozackie za Chmielnickiego czasow chociazby,byly bardziej straszne i okrutne niz ostatni na zydach Holocaust.
    Ale to juz zupelnie inna historia,gdzie sami glownie robili we wlasne koryto ,jak to zwyczaj maja,chociaz to bardziej skomplikowane jak sie bardziej tamtym czasom przyjrzec.

    Mielismy nawet Tatara bochatera i legende ,ktory walczyl w Gwardi Ludowej,za jego glowe czy ujecie niemcy dawali 100 tys zlotych nagrody,nikt go nie wydal.
    Mial zone i synka,po stalinowskich deportacjach Krymskich zona i synek zmarli z glodu i malarji (za ros,wiki)
    Straszna szkoda,moze mial innych krewnych ?

    https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umer_Achmołła_Atamanow

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Information

This entry was posted on October 16, 2015 by in Anti-polonism and tagged , , , , .

Archives

Blog Stats

  • 1,267,986 hits
October 2015
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Opinie wyrażane w tekstach lub komentarzach pod artykułami publikowanymi na łamach JUSTICE4POLAND są własnością autorów i niekoniecznie odpowiadają opiniom wyrażanym przez nasza Redakcje .

 

 

 

 

 

Follow Justice4Poland.com on WordPress.com

All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided on justice4poland.com is for educational purposes only. It is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice. Any views expressed here-in are not necessarily those held by justice4poland.com

ENOUGH LIES

DOSYĆ KŁAMSTW

Walczmy z przejawami antypolonizmu

Translate

WOLNI SŁOWIANIE

Celem jest wpłynięcie na pobudkę polskich Słowian, abyśmy odzyskali naszą ojczyznę

Tarig Anter on Protect & Reinvent Democracy

Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

xebola

"Dla triumfu zła potrzeba tylko, by dobrzy ludzie nic nie robili"

Wirtualna Polonia BIS im. Włodka Kulińskiego

" - Wyśmiewani za niemodny patriotyzm, wierni Bogu i Ojczyźnie podnieśliśmy głowy."

AdNovum

Prawda zawsze zwycięża

M-forum A.V Live.

TU ZNAJDZIESZ CODZIENNIE PONAD 150 INFORMACJI NIUS BEZ CENZURY !! ORAZ TRANSMISJE LIVE STREAM I MATERIAŁY AUDIO I WIDEO W ORYGINALE DOŁACZ SWOJĄ STRONĘ LUB BLOGA DO PROMOWANYCH I POLECANYCH STRON PRZEZ M-FORUM

Paradigm Shift 101

Looking at the world in a different light

WIERNI POLSCE SUWERENNEJ

Strona Stowarzyszenia Wierni Polsce Suwerennej

Niezłomni.com

Connecting true geography and detailed unfolding of wide variety of crimes perpetrated by German/Ukrainian Nazis and jewish bolsheviks of Soviet Union on the Polish nation.

WOLNI SŁOWIANIE

Celem jest wpłynięcie na pobudkę polskich Słowian, abyśmy odzyskali naszą ojczyznę

Tarig Anter on Protect & Reinvent Democracy

Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

xebola

"Dla triumfu zła potrzeba tylko, by dobrzy ludzie nic nie robili"

Wirtualna Polonia BIS im. Włodka Kulińskiego

" - Wyśmiewani za niemodny patriotyzm, wierni Bogu i Ojczyźnie podnieśliśmy głowy."

AdNovum

Prawda zawsze zwycięża

M-forum A.V Live.

TU ZNAJDZIESZ CODZIENNIE PONAD 150 INFORMACJI NIUS BEZ CENZURY !! ORAZ TRANSMISJE LIVE STREAM I MATERIAŁY AUDIO I WIDEO W ORYGINALE DOŁACZ SWOJĄ STRONĘ LUB BLOGA DO PROMOWANYCH I POLECANYCH STRON PRZEZ M-FORUM

Paradigm Shift 101

Looking at the world in a different light

WIERNI POLSCE SUWERENNEJ

Strona Stowarzyszenia Wierni Polsce Suwerennej

Niezłomni.com

Connecting true geography and detailed unfolding of wide variety of crimes perpetrated by German/Ukrainian Nazis and jewish bolsheviks of Soviet Union on the Polish nation.

Niezależne Media Podlasia

Just another WordPress.com site

SKRiBH

zeskrobywanie nieprawdy i czepianie się słów

Connecting true geography and detailed unfolding of wide variety of crimes perpetrated by German/Ukrainian Nazis and jewish bolsheviks of Soviet Union on the Polish nation.

Wolna Polska – Wiadomości

Connecting true geography and detailed unfolding of wide variety of crimes perpetrated by German/Ukrainian Nazis and jewish bolsheviks of Soviet Union on the Polish nation.

Spory o historię i współczesność

Prywatny blog historyczny Bohdana Piętki

Kekusz.pl

Connecting true geography and detailed unfolding of wide variety of crimes perpetrated by German/Ukrainian Nazis and jewish bolsheviks of Soviet Union on the Polish nation.

ProstoPoPolsku

Connecting true geography and detailed unfolding of wide variety of crimes perpetrated by German/Ukrainian Nazis and jewish bolsheviks of Soviet Union on the Polish nation.

Wiadomości

Connecting true geography and detailed unfolding of wide variety of crimes perpetrated by German/Ukrainian Nazis and jewish bolsheviks of Soviet Union on the Polish nation.

Connecting true geography and detailed unfolding of wide variety of crimes perpetrated by German/Ukrainian Nazis and jewish bolsheviks of Soviet Union on the Polish nation.

Vanishing American II

OURSELVES AND OUR POSTERITY

%d bloggers like this: